NPI Guide to Managing USG-Funded HIV/AIDS Programs
- Chapter 1 - Introduction
- Chapter 2 - Your Award
- Chapter 3 - Program Start-Up
-
Chapter 4 - Appraising
Your Organization -
Chapter 5 - Running an Effective
and Compliant Program - Chapter 6 - Reporting: Requirements and Benefits
- Chapter 7 - Seeking Future Funding
- Chapter 8 - Sustainability
- Chapter 9 - Award Close Out
Annexes
-
Annex 1
1a - Organizational Capacity Assessment (OCA)
1b- Technical Organizational Capacity Assessment (TOCA)
1c- Close-Out Organizational Capacity Assessment (CLOCA) -
Annex 2
Glossary of Terms and Acronyms -
Annex 3
Common USAID
Standard Provisions -
Annex 4
Common HHS Public
Policy Requirements -
Annex 5
AOTR Designation Letter -
Annex 6
Guide to Gender Integration
and Analysis -
Annex 7
Sample Workplan
NPI Guide to Managing USG-Funded HIV/AIDS Programs
he New Partners Initiative Guide to Managing U.S. Government-Funded HIV/AIDS Programs was developed to fill a gap in available capacity-building resources to help non-governmental organizations (NGOs) effectively manage PEPFAR funds under the New Partners Initiative (NPI).
The Guide is organized according to the lifecycle of an award: Chapter 2 covers the Award Phase; chapters 3-4 discuss the Start-Up Phase; chapters 5-6 address the Implementation Phase and chapters 7-9 guide the reader through the Close-Out Phase. Each chapter provides links to useful tools that can help non-governmental organizations NGOs implement their organization's work and references to specific documents and Web sites where readers can obtain more detailed information on a particular subject.
The Guide is the fruit of the efforts and experience of numerous USAID and FHI 360 staff members who have spent their careers helping NGOs implement effective and compliant U.S. Government-funded (USG) programs.
Funding for this Guide was provided by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), under the Capable Partners Program (CAP) New Partners Initiative managed by FHI 360. Its contents and views do not necessarily reflect the views of either USAID or the USG.